Daniel Taub: The wrong approach to the Middle East crisis

Daniel Taub served the state of Israel as the ambassador to the United Kingdom for four years between 2011 and 2015. In the four years that he served the nation of Israel, he was happy with the performance of his country. The U.K and Israel established a good relationship that saw an extraordinary expansion of the bilateral ties. Learn more about Daniel Taub: http://israblog.nana10.co.il/blogread.asp?blog=864881 and http://www.behance.net/danieltaub

His tenure was marked by improvements in various fields where the two countries needed each other. There were benefits recorded in areas of academia, trade business and cultural interactions. Daniel was committed to his ambassadorial duties, and as he returned to Israel after the end of his term, he was proud of the achievements he managed to get on behalf of his country.

Daniel Taub used the position he had as ambassador to the U.K to talk about peace in the Middle East. He was concerned that the region was always engaged in the war between nations that neighbor each other. Daniel Taub was trouble about the issue and looked into ways in which the United Kingdom could help the Middle East countries.

However, something was disturbing about the U.K. The only approach that seemed to understand is one of pressuring Israel into a peaceful resolution. To them, this is a method that would promote peace in the Middle East.

However, for Daniel Taub, he had served as in the peace resolution meeting involving some of the countries in this region, and he is certain that this a method that can never work. Read more: Daniel Taub | Ideamench and Daniel Taub | Wikipedia

The attempts by Britain to force this kind of a peace resolution method is just wind which can bear nothing. The country has tried to push for peace through boycott campaigns on Jews and Israeli goods and services.

Such approaches have been attempts to twist the hand of the Israelis, but nothing like that is going to happen. The Jews in Israeli have responded to such attempts by reelecting the same government that the British think they need to remove from power.

Daniel Taub notes that peace in the Middle East region cannot come under pressure from the international community. He notes that the Jews are more receptive to the calls for peace when the international community listens to their concerns.

Those who push for pressure methods think that conciliatory approach will only lead to status quo. The approach to the Middle East crisis needs to be done by all parties being listened to and not just accusing one country of the instability in the region.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *